Subscribe

RSS Feed (xml)

Powered By

Skin Design:
Free Blogger Skins

Powered by Blogger

Monday, September 27, 2010

15 Books That Were Ranked Best By Publishers Weekly

December is when the world celebrates and prepares for the New Year. It's a time for looking into the future and to review the past. Each year experts in every field study the year that has been and list of what was best, what went unnoticed and what was really bad.

Since centuries thousands of books are published each year. A few books receive accolades others are enjoyed and lie forgotten on dusty shelves and yet others go unnoticed. Publishers weekly reviews more than 6000 books both print and online in various categories like fiction, poetry, non fiction, comics, religion, lifestyle, and children's books.

In Fiction PW lists as top picks:

1. Call Me by Your Name by Andre Aciman.

2. Fieldwork by Mischa Berlinski.

3. The Savage Detectives by Roberto Bolario.

4. The Tin Roof Blowdown by James Lee Burke.

5. The Falling Man by Don DeLillo.

6. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz.

7. The Reluctant Fundamentalist by Mohsin Hamid.

8. Returning to earth by Jim Harrison.

9. The Chicago Way by Michael Harvey.

10. The heart-Shaped Box by Joe Hill.

11. The Archivist's Story by Travis Holland.

12. The Body of Lies by David Ignatius.

13. The Tree of Smoke by Denis Johnson.

14. The Bowl of Cherries by Millard Kaufman.

15. What the Dead Know by Laura Lippman.

In fiction for children the top picks were:

1. The Golden dream of Carlo Chuchio by Joyd Alexander.

2. The Absolute True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie.

3. The Sweet Far Thing by Libba Bray.

4. Mistik Lake by Martha Brooks.

5. Someday this Pain will be Useful to You by Peter Carmeron.

6. Revolution is Not a dinner party by Ying Chang Compestine.

7. Elijah of Buxton by Christopher Paul Curtis.

8. A Swift Pure Cry by Siobhan Dowd.

9. Before I Die by Jenny Downham.

10. Evil Genius by Catherine Jinks

11. Bone by Bone by Bone by Tony Johnston.

12. Diary of a Wimpy Kid by Jeff Kinney.

13. Red Spikes by Margo Lanagan.

14. Skulduggery Pleasant by Derek Landy

15. Bullyville by Francine Prose.

lifting straps

Thursday, September 23, 2010

How to Write Good Fantasy Fiction

Following the cinematic success of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Harry Potter, the Narnia Chronicles and, now, the Philip Pullman novels would-be fantasy authors are busy redusting their manuscripts in the hope they will be the next thing to be discovered. Theoretically fantasy fiction should be easy to write. As an author you have little factual research to do, the members of your target audience are already predisposed to the suspension of disbelief that's required of readers, your plot line is not hampered by real-world limitations and your characters do not even have to be human.

By all accounts fantasy fiction should have a huge volume of work and a huge number of writers and yet the fact that it is still considered niche publishing indicates that it is neither easy to write nor can it be always written well. This also means that the current success of Tolkien, Rowlin and Pullman notwithstanding fantasy fiction is still regarded as science fiction's, let alone mainstream fiction's poor relation.

It was in search of answers to these questions that I spoke to Thoma Hunt via email in what is probably one of the rarest exchanges in fantasy fiction. Those who know Thomas Hunt, know he wrote The Shade and know that he does not do media interviews. He is, however, never short of answers when it comes to either writing fiction or talking about the publishing industry and the way it is evolving which is how him and I got going in the first place.

Fantasy fiction, Hunt says, is more about writing about mythical universes. Its appeal harks back to fairy tales and the Jungian archetypes within each culture and each person. Because the appeal occurs at a basic and largely subconscious level it is exceedingly hard to write Fantasy Fiction that reiterates the things we find familiar and comforting in fairy tales and yet breaks new ground in a way that is fresh without being disturbing.

"It's a little like sex," says Thoma Hunt rather disingenuously, "in order for it to work it has to have a certain familiar structure in the sense that we need to roughly know where we are going and what we should expect on the way there. It really does not matter if the payoff is exactly what we expect or something that totally surprises us or even disappoints us. What is important is that the tropes work in such way that they achieve two things: 1. They prepare us, mentally and psychologically, for the journey ahead 2. They make us, through the process of subconscious expectation and mental and psychological preparation, whole-hearted participants to the enterprise. Then the fantasy novel becomes a shared journey of discovery between the author and the reader and a masterpiece is born."

Thomas Hunt makes it sound easy because he's an expert and knows the genre inside out. His novel, The Shade, treads much of the territory. In his analysis of literature, culture and archetypes Jung laid out four main archetypes:

The Self, the regulating center of the psyche and facilitator of individuation. The Shadow, the opposite of the ego image, often containing qualities that the ego does not identify with but possess nonetheless

The Anima, the feminine image in a man's psyche

The Animus, the masculine image in a woman's psyche

Although the number of archetypes is limitless, there are a few particularly notable, recurring archetypal images which appear again and again in fairy tales, epic poems, parables, stories, novels and great literature:

The Syzygy

The Child

The Hero

The Great Mother

The Wise old man

The Trickster or Ape

The Puer Aeternus (Latin for "eternal boy")

The Cosmic Man

The artist-scientist

These archetypes appear with such consistency that it is evident that there is a lot more than mere assumption to the theory. Fantasy Fiction writers who embark upon a tale without an awareness, at least, of the way these archetypes work on the reader's imagination and the reader's expectation are doomed to fail.

"Fantasy fiction has a lot in common with fairy tales," says Thomas Hunt, "it needs to have a message and a moral and it needs to be clear-cut." Which is why, I suppose, sex is such a taboo subject in the genre. "There is very little Fantasy fiction written which actually depicts sex in anything more than hints," says Hunt, "this is one of the conventions of the genre which means that, depending on how you look at it, the time has come to either make it a sacred cow and never question it, or prick the bubble and see what happens."

In The Shade Thomas Hunt has chosen to do the latter depicting sex between adults in a way that makes the story feel claustrophobic almost and makes the almost inhuman protagonist seem, suddenly, very vulnerable and very human.

Is that enough to make a Fantasy novel stand out from the crowd?

"Absolutely not!" says Thomas Hunt, "if you approach writing this way you may as well start believing that changing the font is enough to make a badly written book, good. When I was writing The Shade I had to make a conscious choice whether to stick to the accepted norm regarding sex in Fantasy fiction or stay faithful to the story. I chose to go with the latter conscious of the fact that I was breaking with convention but really wanting to tell the best tale possible."

So writing great Fantasy fiction requires an awareness of the tropes of the genre plus the necessary strength of vision to know when to stay faithful to the story and depart from convention. It requires a story which taps into the arcane archetypes of our psyche and it requires characters which are also reflected by these archetypes. Put all these elements together, allow them to percolate and what you end up with is a tale that is powerful, memorable and fun to read.

polaris pool cleaner

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Walking with King Tut By Darlene Kwarta

When middle school-aged Clayton decides to wander the museum exhibit by himself, he is more than surprised to run into the Boy King himself. Buy book at: www.eloquentbooks.com

mouse traps

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

The Abilene Paradox-Is It Fact or Fiction?

Recently I conducted a creative training program for a large aerospace firm. During the course I asked the training participants to gather into teams. Once their teams were formed I asked each team to brainstorm a creative solution to a hypothetical situation. During the follow-up and team discussion about their solutions, and the process by which they arrived at their recommendation, many of the team members admitted they "went along for the ride." Either they felt overwhelmed by more dominate team members, or they did not believe their solution was as strong as the one agreed upon.

In essence they agreed because everyone else was in agreement, the Abilene Paradox revisited.

For those of you who have discovered that there is fact in the Abilene Paradox you may have, like me, found the outcome of this version of "going along for the ride" usually ends up in a less than satisfactory outcome. For those of you who would like a refresher or a heads-up on the Abilene Paradox here it is in a nut shell, as observed by management expert Jerry B. Harvey.

"On a hot afternoon visiting in Coleman, Texas, the family is comfortably playing dominoes on a porch, until the father-in-law suggests that they take a trip to Abilene (fifty-three miles away to the north) for dinner. The wife says, "Sounds like a great idea." The husband, despite having reservations because the drive is long and hot, thinks that his preferences must be out-of-step with the group and says, "Sounds good to me. I just hope your mother wants to go." The mother-in-law then says, "Of course I want to go. I haven't been to Abilene in a long time."

The drive is hot, dusty, and long. When they arrive at the cafeteria, the food is as bad. They arrive back home four hours later, exhausted. One of them dishonestly says, "It was a great trip, wasn't it." The mother-in-law says that, actually, she would rather have stayed home, but went along since the other three were so enthusiastic. The husband says, "I wasn't delighted to be doing what we were doing. I only went to satisfy the rest of you." The wife says, "I just went along to keep you happy. I would have had to be crazy to want to go out in the heat like that." The father-in-law then says that he only suggested it because he thought the others might be bored.The group sits back, perplexed that they together decided to take a trip which none of them wanted. They each would have preferred to sit comfortably, but did not admit to it when they still had time to enjoy the afternoon."

How many times have you sat back and wondered why you "went along for the ride?" Was it to be nice; to avoid confrontation; to try something new out of boredom? Or, did you actually believe that what was in store on this ride was going to result in a more productive outcome?

Next time you are faced with "going along with the ride" or the Abilene Paradox syndrome shows up in your dialog, apply assertive behavior techniques. For example, use "I language. In addition, when an idea is presented that you believe will take you down a less than desirable path, speak-up and provide an alternative solution. Keep the dialog moving forward until everyone has had the opportunity to say what's on their mind then select an alternative, when appropriate. Now, let's go back to the scenario on the front porch and apply these techniques.

You might say, "I think your idea is great, however I like playing dominos here on the porch with you and the family." The response may then be something like this. "Well it was just a thought; I didn't want you to think I wasn't thinking of you and your Mom." You might respond with another assertive statement, "It's very relaxing here in the shade and I really believe the company is what it's all about."
The idea about driving fifty-three miles across a dusty, hot landscape may be dropped immediately or, there may be additional input from others about alternatives that can work for everyone.

This leads us to the next important step. Let's go back to the front porch conversation. If you are the person who suggests the fifty-three mile trek, stay assertive by contributing to the ideas as they begin to unfold during the discussion. Sulking because your idea did not meet with everyone's agreement makes you look as if you do not have personal confidence or confidence in others to develop additional ideas. Something wonderful may happen, you may come up with a better idea or the other individuals may come up with another idea or stay focused on the current course of action. Not all change is needed or necessary.

Whether you are in a family, team or group setting. Ask yourself. "Is the proposed idea the best solution?" Speak up and use the "I" language. And, if you suggested the original idea, listen to the recommendations of others. Figuratively speaking, who knows you may discover you really don't need to take that long fifty-three mile trek across a hot and dusty landscape there may be a different route.

braun 360 playground markings sports wall decals

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Healing with Dreams

There were many nights as a new widow, I fell into an exhausted, restless sleep. In the first two years after my husband's death, I had countless dreams in which he appeared. My dreaming seemed to revolve around day-to-day issues with my kids, money, fear of failure, and later, reentering the dating world. Often I would awake from a dream and try to decipher the meaning. I had been doing this for years, but having lost my husband, the dreams now held special significance.

If a dream felt particularly vivid, I would write it down. Sometimes bits and pieces would be recalled at a later point in the day, almost like a déjà vu moment. I sometimes experienced an "ah-ha" moment, and yet other times I wondered why I had crazy and confusing dreams. Then there were the comforting dreams. I speculated was it really my husband communicating with me, or was my subconscious responsible for the messages received?

Whatever the source, dreams wove all through my healing process. There were nights I went to bed feeling on the edge of despair, only to awaken and recall a dream offering hope and new meaning. On the days I felt frail in my grief, hopeful messages were held tightly to my heart. Perhaps I was too busy during the day to pay attention to my own fears, so during sleep, some of the answers were provided.

Some mornings I recalled only a snippet of a dream. I went through a period of incredible stress regarding one of my children's relationship issues. In a dream during that period, when my son seemed to be floundering, I woke with these words in my head, "He rose to the top." There was immediate comfort and I knew my son would be okay.

When career opportunities went nowhere, I fell into inertia, feeling as if I was suspended in limbo. I was afraid my life would never feel right. I had a dream one night that I stood naked before a blank wall. My husband entered the room, fully dressed with a knapsack on his back. In the dream he asked me was I happy to see him. I exclaimed with joy, jumped on him, and said of course I was. He laughed and hugged me.

In thinking about the dream later, I realized that I was ready to move forward with my life, but there was part of me still unhealed and hugging his memory to me. That dream made it clear to me that he was moving on to where he needed to be. I, too, had to move on, but not force anything or rush myself. I had a fresh life ahead of me and when the time was right, it would all fall into place. I also realized I couldn't let the past keep me at a standstill, staring at a blank wall.

When my middle son went through a tough time, similarly "stuck" in place, I dreamed he and I were driving down a country road and his father followed us in his own vehicle. A big tree fell across the road behind us, blocking my husband's vehicle. We got out and my husband stood there on the other side of the tree. He said to us, "Go ahead without me. I'll meet you later." I felt the message was for both my son and I, to keep going ahead with life.

My last significant dream of my husband came at a time when I knew I had to veer off a path I was taking. In the dream, he wasn't visiting or stopping by to say hello. He told me he had to leave, there was something he had to do. I knew with absolute certainty that he was dead.

I awoke from this dream crying, knowing this would be our last communication. This occurred at approximately two and a half years after his passing. From that point on, I dreamed only rarely of him, and the dreams were almost static, as if he was there, but not participating in the dream. He had moved on.

At about three years after his passing, I dreamed he was coming back for a short time, and I didn't want him to come back. I had made myself a new life and evolved into a totally different person. I knew also that if he came back, temporarily, it would throw my children into turmoil when he left again.

I felt guilty over my perceived message in this dream, that I didn't want him to come back. I went back and forth with myself for months over its possible meaning to me. Ultimately, I realized the truth was quite simple. I truly believe he had his own "work" to complete on the other side, just as I have many things to accomplish in my life.

We are both where we're supposed to be.

Elaine Williams ©2008

lifting straps shower systems dorm refrigerator

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Friday, September 3, 2010

How to Write a Limerick

Limericks are short poems of five lines long, with a rhyme scheme of aabba. This means that the first, second and fifth lines rhyme and so do the third and fourth.

Limericks are always funny and often silly.

Here is a limerick written by the famous limerick writer, Edward Lear:

There was an Old Person of Putney,
Whose food was roast spiders and chutney,
Which he took with his tea
Within sight of the sea,
That romantic Old Person of Putney.

Read this limerick aloud a few times so that you can hear the rhythm. It goes like this:

Da da dum da da dum da da dum
Da da dum da da dum da da dum
Da da dum da da dum
Da dad um dad a dum
Da da dum da da dum da da dum

See how the last word of the first lines are the same; the place name, Putney. Lear did this in most of his limericks, but not all of them.

See also how Lear uses lots of prepositions: whose... which ... within. They all come at the start of a line.

Another thing you may have noticed is that Lear gives the name of the person in his limerick capital letters:

an Old Person of Putney
but he doesn't give her an actual name like Lucy or Jane.

Now write your own limerick using the writing frame below. Make sure you keep the rhythm, rhyme and silliness of Lear's. You might like to use the name of the place where you live, or one you know well. But be careful what you choose. Some place names are difficult or even impossible to find rhymes for.

There was a young person of...........................,

Who/whose ....................................................,

He/she......................................................,

...........................................................,

That ......................young person of ....................

Here's one that I wrote using the name of the town where I live:

There was a young person of Crook,
Whose head became stuck in a book,
She tugged at the pages,
For ages and ages,
That bookish young person of Crook

shower systems chafing dishes braun 360